<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>rowast[DOT]com &#187; articles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rowast.com/tag/articles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rowast.com</link>
	<description>personally impersonable</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:53:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>waterboard the crusader</title>
		<link>http://rowast.com/2009/06/07/waterboard-the-crusader/</link>
		<comments>http://rowast.com/2009/06/07/waterboard-the-crusader/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 23:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waterboarding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rowast.com/?p=563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all know the sad story of what happened to Dr. Tiller at the hands of a zealot who views the world in his own perverted view. Now the assailant who I won&#8217;t name because he should be forgotten, is &#8230; <a href="http://rowast.com/2009/06/07/waterboard-the-crusader/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know the sad story of what happened to Dr. Tiller at the hands of a zealot who views the world in his own perverted view.  Now the assailant who I won&#8217;t name because he should be forgotten, is <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/us_world/2009/06/07/2009-06-07_scott_roeder_charged_with_abortion_doctor_george_tillers_murder_says_more_violen.html">threatening more action from behind bars</a>.</p>
<p>In a couple of calls to the AP he has basically stated that if abortion remains legal more violence will occur.  Let me repeat that, a known domestic terrorist is threatening more violence, and only he knows the details about that violence.</p>
<p>So using the logic of our former VP doesn&#8217;t that mean we should water board him?  Waterboarding is wrong but using the logic of the far right, if we only do it to one person its okay right?  <strong>(No of course it&#8217;s not)</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rowast.com/2009/06/07/waterboard-the-crusader/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your IT Department is killing us all</title>
		<link>http://rowast.com/2009/05/01/your-it-department-is-killing-us-all/</link>
		<comments>http://rowast.com/2009/05/01/your-it-department-is-killing-us-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 17:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cnet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[it]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rowast.com/?p=548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[60% of companies use IE6 as their default browser I just finished reading an excellent post over at the webware blog, by Larry Dignan entitled What Browser Wars? The Enterprise Still Loves IE6. In this article he details the corporate &#8230; <a href="http://rowast.com/2009/05/01/your-it-department-is-killing-us-all/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote class="alignright"><p>60% of companies use IE6 as their default browser</p></blockquote>
<p>I just finished reading an excellent post over at the <a href="http://www.webware.com">webware blog</a>, by Larry Dignan entitled <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10231713-2.html?part=rss&#038;tag=feed&#038;subj=Webware">What Browser Wars?  The Enterprise Still Loves IE6.</a>  In this article he details the corporate worlds long (and continuing) love affair with Internet Explorer 6.</p>
<p>In this article he doesn&#8217;t break any new ground but he does reveal some stats that are just amazing.  I knew that corporations love IE6, out of the people I am closest with I am the only one without IE6 in my life.  However, I did not expect to see that IE6 enjoyed a 60% market share in the corporate world, I expected something between 45 and 50 percent.</p>
<p>The article goes on to ask many questions about how IT departments are killing productivity with browser specific solutions (theres no excuse for those any more, <strong>period</strong>) and uses the usual anology of giving workers an antiquated piece of technology to deal with current problems.</p>
<p>Where I really enjoyed the article however was where he talked about reasons to switch.  All too often these articles pile on about IE6&#8242;s myriad amount of problems without detailing why even IE7 or IE8 are better.  This article is worth a read because it not only showcases why IE6 is bad but it also provides a great crib sheet you can use for winning over your IT department to your line of thinking regarding IE6.</p>
<p>If you need help killing IE6 there is a number of solutions out there in addition to the article talked about here, these include the website from .net magazine <a href="http://www.bringdownie6.com">bringdownie6.com, and <a href="http://www.saveIE6.com">saveIE6.com</a>, or you can simply do a search to find many more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rowast.com/2009/05/01/your-it-department-is-killing-us-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>physicians against</title>
		<link>http://rowast.com/2008/05/29/physicians-against/</link>
		<comments>http://rowast.com/2008/05/29/physicians-against/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 18:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latimes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rowast.com/?p=1499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How could an article entitled State Supreme Court may give gays a medical victory make me angry, I wondered. Upon reading it, I now know. The case stems from a woman who wanted to have a baby with her partner &#8230; <a href="http://rowast.com/2008/05/29/physicians-against/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How could an article entitled <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-doctor29-2008may29,0,592068.story">State Supreme Court may give gays a medical victory</a> make me angry, I wondered.</p>
<p>Upon reading it, I now know.  The case stems from a woman who wanted to have a baby with her partner and the medical office she was a patient of denying her service, they say because she was an unwed mother, she says because she happened to be lesbian.  Unfortunate but not all that surprising unfortunately.  The part that set me off was to follow however.</p>
<blockquote><p>Chief Justice Ronald M. George, asked a lawyer for the doctors whether they could refuse to treat patients of their ethnic backgrounds.</p>
<p>Kenneth R. Pedroza, who represented the North Coast Women&#8217;s Care Medical Group replied &#8220;the answer would seem to be yes.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p>Why must we accept peoples religious bigotry?  This argument appears to say that slavery would be okay, if it were a deeply held religious belief.  What else could we excuse?  We have shown in this country that certain &#8220;deeply held religious beliefs&#8221; are not acceptable, ie. polygamy, why can&#8217;t stomp out what can be only referred to as discrimination.</p>
<p>Religion is a wonderful thing for some people, but it should be used as a tool to bring people from all walks of life together, not as a tool to further push us apart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rowast.com/2008/05/29/physicians-against/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>overstepping the climate crisis</title>
		<link>http://rowast.com/2008/04/11/overstepping-the-climate-crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://rowast.com/2008/04/11/overstepping-the-climate-crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climatecrisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rowast.com/?p=1483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The California Public Utilities Commision is wrong. They are wrong because they are going to asess a new tax that will fund an institute that will look for ways to curb California&#8217;s global warming output. Now some of you might &#8230; <a href="http://rowast.com/2008/04/11/overstepping-the-climate-crisis/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The California Public Utilities Commision is wrong.</p>
<p>They are wrong because they are going to asess a new tax that will fund an institute that will look for ways to curb California&#8217;s global warming output.  Now some of you might say, but Robert global warming is an incredible problem and we must do all we can to stop it, and I couldn&#8217;t agree more however this is not the PUC&#8217;s job and that is why I object.</p>
<p>It is my understanding (and I could be wrong) that their job is to &#8220;regulate privately-owned utilities in the state of California, including electric power, telecommunications, natural gas, water and transportation companies. In addition, the commission regulates household goods movers and rail crossing safety.&#8221; <cite><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Public_Utilities_Commission">thanks wikipedia</a></cite>, their job is not to develop new technology no matter how noble the goal.</p>
<p>We have a California Air Resources Board for that.</p>
<p>I believe the climate crisis is possibly the number one threat to our planet, but this is not the way to solve it.  The PUC should do its job, and quit taxing residents of this state for research and development that is outside the scope of the agency.</p>
<p>For more you can read an article at the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/science/environment/la-fi-institute11apr11,1,2117082.story?track=rss">LA Times</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rowast.com/2008/04/11/overstepping-the-climate-crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do not want!</title>
		<link>http://rowast.com/2008/03/12/do-not-want/</link>
		<comments>http://rowast.com/2008/03/12/do-not-want/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screenshots]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newfoundnoise82.com/?p=291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I&#8217;m killing time at work before the top of the hour and we have to deliver some things to another building on campus and so I figured I would browse slashdot and digg just to see what was going &#8230; <a href="http://rowast.com/2008/03/12/do-not-want/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#8217;m killing time at work before the top of the hour and we have to deliver some things to another building on campus and so I figured I would browse <a href="http://www.slashdot.org">slashdot</a> and digg just to see what was going on in the nerd world, and I saw a story about republicans voting for Hillary to derail the <a href="http://www.barackobama.com">Obama campaign</a>.</p>
<p>Once the page loads I happily roll my mouse down from the tabs towards the article link when suddenly I am attacked by&#8230;.  well the image below will show you.</p>
<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3116/2329857368_7d1ee64d93_o.png" alt="digg flash ad" /></p>
<p>Yes, that is a ginormous effin breakfast burrito.  Problems like this at digg have happened before only I haven&#8217;t been exposed to them as I have happily used adblock at work to stop annoying flash based ads and media players, but that doesn&#8217;t work when I am at work.</p>
<p>I am an ardent user of digg, it&#8217;s one of the sites I visit every day and probably multiple times a day, but lately it&#8217;s been seeming less and less like the hang out for whats going on in the world and in tech and more and more like a money driven myspace clone.</p>
<p>I want to stick with digg, and I don&#8217;t expect them to stop serving up ads with their links, but stop with the obtrusive ads, because if you don&#8217;t the crowd will leave and then who will you serve the ads to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rowast.com/2008/03/12/do-not-want/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 years after netscape</title>
		<link>http://rowast.com/2008/01/25/10-years-after-netscape/</link>
		<comments>http://rowast.com/2008/01/25/10-years-after-netscape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 06:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bdays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mozilla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newfoundnoise82.com/?p=268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just now it came to my attention that today marks the 10 year anniversary of what was effectively the dawn of The Mozilla Project, the non profit that brought us such gems as firefox, thunderbird, camino (mac only), and many &#8230; <a href="http://rowast.com/2008/01/25/10-years-after-netscape/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just now it came to my attention that today marks the 10 year anniversary of what was effectively the dawn of <a href="http://www.mozilla.org">The Mozilla Project</a>, the non profit that brought us such gems as <a href="http://www.getfirefox.com">firefox</a>, <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/thunderbird/">thunderbird</a>, <a href="http://caminobrowser.org/">camino (mac only)</a>, and many more projects based off of any one of their apps (<a href="http://www.flock.com">flock</a> anyone?).</p>
<p>We sit on the eve of firefox 3, (I&#8217;m using the beta build right now to post this from) and looking back on the last ten years online for myself personally it&#8217;s incredible.  I used netscape back then but soon moved on to IE not knowing how derided and detested it would end up being for various reasons by those the world over myself included.</p>
<p>Without firefox I would have viable alternatives in browsers like Konqueror for Linux, Opera and heck even Safari for Windows but I would not be as satisfied as I am now.</p>
<p>I felt I wanted to write something to mark this day, not as a way to say Happy Birthday to firefox or to congratulate them on the last ten years but rather to wish them success over the next ten.</p>
<p>Hopefully market share can be gained and Microsoft can finally be pushed to support web standards, who knows maybe in ten years Internet Explorer will have gone the way of Mosaic, at the least we will be done with IE6 (Thank god).</p>
<p>If you want to read more here&#8217;s <a href="http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/mitchell/archives/2008/01/january_22_1998_the_beginning.html">the original Netscape press release regarding the GPL release of the source code</a>, or you can <a href="http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/mitchell/archives/2008/01/mozilla_celebrating_the_first.html">read the post marking the anniversary over on mitchell&#8217;s blog</a> @ mozilla.</p>
<p>Or if you would like click the button below to &#8220;rediscover the web&#8221;.<br />
<a href="http://www.spreadfirefox.com/node&amp;id=0&amp;t=213"><img border="0" alt="Firefox 2" title="Firefox 2" src="http://sfx-images.mozilla.org/affiliates/Buttons/firefox2/firefox-spread-btn-2.png"/></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rowast.com/2008/01/25/10-years-after-netscape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sacrificing freedom for safety</title>
		<link>http://rowast.com/2007/12/17/sacrificing-freedom-for-safety/</link>
		<comments>http://rowast.com/2007/12/17/sacrificing-freedom-for-safety/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 06:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newfoundnoise82.com/?p=259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“The civil libertarians among us would rather defend the constitution than protect our nation’s security.” That wouldn&#8217;t be terribly alarming if it came from the likes of Bill O&#8217;Reilly, Sean Hannity or others of that ilk like Rush Limbaugh but &#8230; <a href="http://rowast.com/2007/12/17/sacrificing-freedom-for-safety/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“The civil libertarians among us would rather <em>defend the constitution</em> than protect our nation’s security.”</p></blockquote>
<p>That wouldn&#8217;t be terribly alarming if it came from the likes of Bill O&#8217;Reilly, Sean Hannity or others of that ilk like Rush Limbaugh but no it came from United States senator Jeff Sessions from Alabama in regards to the debate surrounding the FISA bill before the senate.</p>
<p>Now I will keep myself from going on a rant and just finish this post with a merging of a couple famous quotes from great historical figures.</p>
<p>We can not defend freedom abroad by deserting it at home, if we give up a little of our freedom for a little safety we will have neither ultimately.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t know what FISA is, then get educated from @ <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Intelligence_Surveillance_Act">wiki</a></p>
<p>Oh and thanks <a href="http://digg.com/politics/this_Senator_s_words_should_shock_the_American_conscience">digg</a>, and thanks <a href="http://unamericanrevolution.com/policy/betrayal-of-the-american-conscience/">UnamericanRevolution</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rowast.com/2007/12/17/sacrificing-freedom-for-safety/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In All Fairness … Internet Explorer Still Stinks</title>
		<link>http://rowast.com/2007/11/22/in-all-fairness-%e2%80%a6-internet-explorer-still-stinks/</link>
		<comments>http://rowast.com/2007/11/22/in-all-fairness-%e2%80%a6-internet-explorer-still-stinks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 02:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>digg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newfoundnoise82.com/?p=251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is something many have said for quite a long time, and that I have been saying for just as long. It took me a long time to come around but now that I have my browsing experience has been &#8230; <a href="http://rowast.com/2007/11/22/in-all-fairness-%e2%80%a6-internet-explorer-still-stinks/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is something many have said for quite a long time, and that I have been saying for just as long.  It took me a long time to come around but now that I have my browsing experience has been much improved and the same can be said for anyone I know who uses a different browser, I prefer firefox but opera and others are incredible as well.</p>
<p>With all that said this is the story of how SitePoint tried to give Internet Explorer a fighting chance … and it lost anyway.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/11/22/in-all-fairness-%e2%80%a6-internet-explorer-still-stinks/">read more</a> | <a href="http://digg.com/microsoft/In_All_Fairness_h_Internet_Explorer_Still_Stinks">digg story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rowast.com/2007/11/22/in-all-fairness-%e2%80%a6-internet-explorer-still-stinks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>verizon wireless is anti choice?</title>
		<link>http://rowast.com/2007/09/27/verizon-wireless-is-anti-choice/</link>
		<comments>http://rowast.com/2007/09/27/verizon-wireless-is-anti-choice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genderpolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newfoundnoise82.com/?p=212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shame on you Verizon Wireless, that&#8217;s something I don&#8217;t often say since you are a huge part of my life, what with my fathers employment, and my cell service coming from them after all. But shame for doing this, and &#8230; <a href="http://rowast.com/2007/09/27/verizon-wireless-is-anti-choice/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shame on you Verizon Wireless, that&#8217;s something I don&#8217;t often say since you are a huge part of my life, what with my fathers employment, and my cell service coming from them after all.</p>
<p>But shame for doing <a href="http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2007/09/27/verizon_turns_down_abortion_rights_group/">this</a>, and while I agree with &#8220;legal authorities&#8221; that VZW is well within its rights in doing this, it doesn&#8217;t mean that it is right.  If this was a program where text messages went to all customers on a mandatory basis then blocking it entirely would be appropriate.</p>
<p>Instead however you decided to duct tape the mouth of a group who simply wanted to communicate with like minded people, not convert those who disagreed.  Shame.  When there was so many good and valid reasons to accept this, you chose the cowards way out to avoid controversy, well you let this customer down.</p>
<p>Denying this program is something I just don&#8217;t understand, at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rowast.com/2007/09/27/verizon-wireless-is-anti-choice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Half a million per minute in Iraq</title>
		<link>http://rowast.com/2007/09/23/500000-per-minute-is-what-the-iraqi-war-costs/</link>
		<comments>http://rowast.com/2007/09/23/500000-per-minute-is-what-the-iraqi-war-costs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>digg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newfoundnoise82.com/?p=201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amount the war in Iraq costs per minute, according to a new analysis by Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz and Harvard’s Linda Bilmes, put out by the American Friends Service Committee. The study finds that this $720 million a day &#8230; <a href="http://rowast.com/2007/09/23/500000-per-minute-is-what-the-iraqi-war-costs/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amount the war in Iraq costs per minute, according to a new analysis by Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz and Harvard’s Linda Bilmes, put out by the American Friends Service Committee. The study finds that this $720 million a day could buy homes for 6,500 families or health care for 423,529 families.</p>
<p>The war in Iraq has cost LA County over 14 billion dollars alone, the time is now to end this war and impeach the men who started it!  They have swindled our treasure away, reduced our influence abroad and worst of all, they have allowed thousands of our bravest to perish for a lie.</p>
<p><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/22/500000-2">read more</a> | <a href="http://digg.com/politics/500_000_per_minute_is_what_the_Iraqi_War_costs">digg story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rowast.com/2007/09/23/500000-per-minute-is-what-the-iraqi-war-costs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

